wedding invitation wording etiquette ?

November 29, 2009

How do you word a wedding invitation where the bride’s parents are paying for 77% of the wedding and the groom’s are paying for 23%?
the 77/23 split was not intentional, that’s just what they are ending up paying…..

do you think that having their names listed on the invitation as the following is enough?–
mr. and mrs john doe (brides parents)
request the honour of your presence at the wedding of their daughter
jane doe
to
bob smith
son of mr. and mrs. james smith…….

or do you think that having both parents in the first lines are appropriate, given how much more the bride’s parents are paying?

Mr. and Mrs. Smith (brides parents)
request the honor of your presence
at the marriage of their daughter
Helen Marie
and
Mr. Raymond Jones
Son of Mr. and Mrs Jones (grooms parents)

OR

Mr. and Mrs. Smith (brides parents)
Along with Mr and Mrs Jones
request the honor of your presence
at the marriage of
Helen Marie
and
Mr. Raymond Jones

  1. 8 Responses to “wedding invitation wording etiquette ?”

  2. Mr. and Mrs. Smith (brides parents)
    request the honor of your presence
    at the marriage of their daughter
    Helen Marie
    and
    Mr. Raymond Jones
    Son of Mr. and Mrs Jones (grooms parents)

    OR

    Mr. and Mrs. Smith (brides parents)
    Along with Mr and Mrs Jones
    request the honor of your presence
    at the marriage of
    Helen Marie
    and
    Mr. Raymond Jones
    References :

    By Lillyan on Nov 29, 2009

  3. I would just say…

    Together with their parents
    Jane Doe and John Doe
    invite you to celebrate…

    The grooms parents covered an even smaller percentage of the wedding cost than that, and that was the phrasing we decided to go with. Nobody had any problems with it.
    References :

    By Sage on Nov 29, 2009

  4. How did you come up with this number division?

    Anyways, I think you should say,

    Mr and Mrs Smith and Mr and Mrs Doe request the honor of your presence at the marriage of their children, John and Jane. The fact that the groom’s name is mentioned first is good enough.
    References :

    By nnaming2000 on Nov 29, 2009

  5. check http://www.invitationsbydawn.com
    They have TONS of versus, I found the website very helpful
    good Luck
    References :

    By Kristen on Nov 29, 2009

  6. We botched it and didn’t include the grooms’ parents and we are ‘paying’ for it now. I would suggest your research how to add the grooms’ parents to the invitation – save yourself a headache!
    References :

    By LdySprtn on Nov 29, 2009

  7. It doesn’t matter who is paying for what, you just include both sets of parents’ names out of respect, and it shows who belongs to who!

    I much prefer the wording -

    Jane Mary,
    daughter of John and Lois Doe
    and
    Robert Mark,
    son of Peter and Marsha Smith,
    request the honour of your presence…..
    References :

    By Lydia on Nov 29, 2009

  8. Because you have shared in
    our lives
    by your friendship and love, we
    Karrie Ester Bryant
    and
    Matthew Edward Mergesen
    together with our parents
    invite you to share
    the beginning of our new life
    together
    when we exchange marriage
    vows
    Sunday, the sixteenth of December
    Two thousand twelve
    five-thirty in the evening
    Casa Monica Hotel
    St. Augustine, Florida

    Reception to follow

    References :

    By Wedding Plannner and now B2B too on Nov 29, 2009

  9. My mom’s paying for about 90% of mine. This is how I worded it.

    Ms. Jane Doe requests the honor of your presence
    at the marriage of her daughter,
    Elizabeth Marie
    to
    John Michael Smith,
    Son of Mr. and Mrs. William Smith
    References :

    By devilishangel on Nov 29, 2009

Post a Comment

© 2010 - Wedding Invitation Etiquette - Theme by XHTMLValid.com